----- Original Message -----
From: "Ara Abrahamian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Monday, February 25, 2002 10:07 pm
Subject: RE: [Xdoclet-devel] Re: RE: grammar

> Doesn't work for an obvious reason: it catches the parse exception but
> goes on parsing the rest in finally block with a 
> popNode/closeNode! 8-)

1) We can hand-edit the java parser and take away the finally.

> 
> > Maybe. In the current scenario there is only one of the 60000 
> threads> running at a time, because of the locking. We could use 60000
> Runnables
> > instead and just have 2 threads: the main and the parser thread, 
> which> jumps back and forth between the Runnables. This kills your
> scalability
> > argument I think.
> 
> Two running but 60000 OS threads created and that's the overhead. Btw,
> let's forget it because which stupid guy is going to create such a 

there are many stupid guys...

> hugeproject and rerun from scratch every time? You know the timestamp
> checking system is smart enough to not generate if nothing changed 
> for a
> template.
> 

2) Yeah, but I think we should still create only two threads and let 
the parser thread jump between several runnables (because of the stupid 
guy). 


Can you take a look at it and take make a decision between 1 or 2? I'm 
into the testing business right now.

Aslak

> What a crawling day and night it was, phew....
> 

;-)

> Ara.
> 
> 
> _________________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xdoclet-devel mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-devel
> 


_______________________________________________
Xdoclet-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-devel

Reply via email to