On 2002.03.01 19:48:22 -0500 Erik Hatcher wrote: > Thanks! I'll give it a try soon. > > After seeing your commit messages, it was indeed a bigger change than I > envisioned - but luckily didn't too terrible. > > Many thanks for your effort on this! > > Erik > > p.s. Is it possible/desirable to set the reply-to on the list e-mails to > come back to the list rather than the individual?
Unfortunately not. Sourceforge seems to have decided to annoy all their users by insisting that all their lists have to adhere to this policy. If you learn fast maybe you'll only be sending 10% of your messages away from the list after a few weeks of practice ;-)) david jencks > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Vincent Harcq" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Devel XDoclet" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Friday, March 01, 2002 4:20 PM > Subject: [Xdoclet-devel] Timestamp generation checks > > > > Erik, > > I did what you wanted. > > This was needed absolutely - agree 100% with you. > > I also added some more checking. These were in my mind for some times > > and marshmallow with what you wanted so the endless discussion we had. > > Sorry about that - i still try to understand how my brain works > > sometimes ;) > > Come back if you have problems, I did not make real tests only debug > > messages... > > Vincent > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Xdoclet-devel mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-devel > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Xdoclet-devel mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-devel > > _______________________________________________ Xdoclet-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-devel
