Bugs item #522926, was opened at 2002-02-26 13:12 You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=402704&aid=522926&group_id=31602
Category: ejbdoclet Group: None >Status: Closed Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Vincent Harcq (vharcq) Summary: dataHolder not set to null in passivate Initial Comment: Hi, I'm using Bluestone as my application server. And he reuses my remote interface this is allowed according to the specs. Only then the old data is retruned when I call getData() because it isn't created. There must be an ejbPassivate methode where the dataObject is set to null. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Vincent Harcq (vharcq) Date: 2002-03-01 11:17 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=125677 Sorry but the spec says that a bean is resent to the Pool in two cases : ejbPassivate and ejbRemove. If BlueStone reuse instances without calling one of these methods then it is a BlueStone problem. When sending back an instance to the pool it calls something right? unsetEntityContext maybe ? Then hack you xdoclet to call ejbPassivate from unsetEntityContext Figure 23 - Chapter 10.5.1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Date: 2002-03-01 10:12 Message: Logged In: NO Sorry, it's seems to be an _option_ in bluestone! It will not call the ejbPassivate unless you specify it to do so. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Vincent Harcq (vharcq) Date: 2002-02-28 22:24 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=125677 It is being realeased by ejbPassivate today wich is correct I also added realsing in ejbRemove() ejb 2 spec 10.5.1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Marcus Brito (pazu) Date: 2002-02-26 13:42 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=360347 The dataObject is serializable, so there is no need to set it as null during passivation. The application server should be able to serialize the dataObject during passivation. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=402704&aid=522926&group_id=31602 _______________________________________________ Xdoclet-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-devel
