Create a GenericDocletTask class which has no dependency to Ant, just elements/validate/execute/etc there. Then derive a DocletTask (for compatibility reasons this name) which derives from DocletTask but is dependent to Ant. You don't have to derive it from Ant's Task class, I believe Ant can handle this way too. Later we'll add a CommandListDocletTask maybe. An IDE plugin can instantiate/configure/use GenericDocletTask directly.
And, don't spend too much time on it, there's some tricky parts to handle, maybe Ant enumerated types and stuff like that. Ara. > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:xdoclet-devel- > [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Aslak Helles�y > Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 3:19 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [Xdoclet-devel] xdoclet without ant > > Since I'm already in refactoring hell and I have to rewrite the > DocletTask, > I thought I might give a shot to decouple xdoclet from ant, so that it can > be run without Ant. (I won't remove Ant support of course.) > > Does anybody have any suggestions about how we can specify subtasks and > other info we send to xdoclet via ant today in a non-ant environment? > > Aslak > > _________________________________________________________________ > Join the world�s largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. > http://www.hotmail.com > > > _______________________________________________ > Xdoclet-devel mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-devel _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ Xdoclet-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-devel
