Bugs item #517022, was opened at 2002-02-13 16:51 You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=402704&aid=517022&group_id=31602
Category: ejbdoclet Group: cvs Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Matt (mpetteys) >Assigned to: Aslak Helles�y (rinkrank) Summary: Patch: get/set methods for ejb:relation Initial Comment: Attached is a patch to create setter/getter methods for functions that are part of an ejb:relation. With an ejb:relation you want still want the getter setter method published in the interface so you can modify the relationship but you cannot mark the method as ejb:persistent-field because that field is created in the database through the defined relationship. So this method looks through the methods looking for the ejb:relation fields and creating the getter/setter methods. cvs -z9 diff entitycmp.j (in directory C:\java\xdoclet\core\resources\xdoclet\ejb\) Index: entitycmp.j ======================================================= ============ RCS file: /cvsroot/xdoclet/xdoclet/core/resources/xdoclet/e jb/entitycmp.j,v retrieving revision 1.32 diff -r1.32 entitycmp.j 40a41,50 > <XDtMethod:forAllMethods> > <XDtMethod:ifHasMethodTag tagName="ejb:relation"> > public abstract <XDtMethod:methodType/> <XDtMethod:getterMethod/>() <XDtMethod:exceptionList/>; > <XDtMethod:ifHasMethod name="<XDtMethod:setterMethod/>" parameters="<XDtMethod:methodType/>"> > public abstract void <XDtMethod:setterMethod/>( <XDtMethod:methodType/> <XDtMethod:propertyName/> ) <XDtMethod:exceptionList method="<XDtMethod:setterMethod/>"/>; > </XDtMethod:ifHasMethod> > > </XDtMethod:ifHasMethodTag> > </XDtMethod:forAllMethods> > *****CVS exited normally with code 1***** ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Matt (mpetteys) Date: 2002-02-15 23:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=258771 I am not an expert so I don't know how the classloader sees these things but I know that at least the JBOSS app server generates an error if the abstract methods are not in the CMP class themselves. Existing code in XDoclet recreates the abstract fields that are in the bean class and declared with ejb:persistent-field into the CMP class so there are duplicate abstract methods in both classes? There must be a reason for that? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andrew Stevens (stevensa) Date: 2002-02-13 20:32 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=247081 Am I missing something, or is this unnecessary? You'll already have the abstract getter/setter methods in the bean class, in order to put the @ejb:interface-method tags on them. So they'll already be inherited by the CMP class (and hence by the EJB Container generated stuff) whether or not it repeats the abstract declaration in xdoclet's CMP class? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=402704&aid=517022&group_id=31602 _______________________________________________ Xdoclet-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-devel
