> Hi Konstantin. Sounds good. Keep up the good work. > Is the plan to > re-work all the existing templates to use Velocity, > or will it just be an > alternate syntax?
AFAIK, velocity support is planned for 1.3 release. > Konstantin> I suppose you look at xdoclet, and put > your work there. > - Test-first design. I've tried to write > unit-tests for features before > I implement them. As a result, the EJB > object-model at the core of > vDoclet is fairly robust. Hmm, xdoclet was ejbdoclet, but it does not mean it is tied to ejb. There is already a lot of abuses reprted :) Basically it's a tool to process javadoc tagged class source code using templates into something completely different. > - Avoiding the named-parameter syntax within tag > values. Sorry, but I > just dislike it. So far, I've managed to avoid > "structured" tags in > vDoclet (though I'm yet to tackle the EJB-2.0 > relationship issue :-) Well, here we disagree :) named parameter syntax was introduced because position based parameters were a bitch to handle. NOw they are somehow easier... But to solve problem there is xtags/xdocletgui underway. Xtags would formally describe the tags usiong XML syntax, and xdocletgui would assist in tagging sources right way. Ultimate goal is to made it impossible to screw tags :) regards, ===== Konstantin Priblouda ( ko5tik ) Freelance Software developer < http://www.pribluda.de > < play java games -> http://www.yook.de > < render charts online -> http://www.pribluda.de/povray/ > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Tax Center - online filing with TurboTax http://taxes.yahoo.com/ _______________________________________________ Xdoclet-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-devel