> Hi Konstantin.  Sounds good.  Keep up the good work.
>  Is the plan to
> re-work all the existing templates to use Velocity,
> or will it just be an
> alternate syntax?

AFAIK, velocity support is planned for 1.3 release.

>   Konstantin> I suppose you look at xdoclet, and put
> your work there.

>   - Test-first design.  I've tried to write
> unit-tests for features before
>     I implement them.  As a result, the EJB
> object-model at the core of
>     vDoclet is fairly robust.

Hmm, xdoclet was ejbdoclet, but it does not mean it is
tied to ejb.  There is already a lot of abuses reprted
:) Basically it's a tool to process javadoc tagged
class source code using templates into something 
completely different. 


>   - Avoiding the named-parameter syntax within tag
> values.  Sorry, but I
>     just dislike it.  So far, I've managed to avoid
> "structured" tags in
>     vDoclet (though I'm yet to tackle the EJB-2.0
> relationship issue :-)

Well, here we disagree :) named parameter syntax was
introduced because position based parameters were a
bitch to handle. NOw they are somehow easier...

But to solve problem there is xtags/xdocletgui
underway. 

Xtags would formally describe the tags usiong XML
syntax, and xdocletgui would assist in tagging sources
right way. Ultimate goal is to made it impossible to
screw tags :)



regards,

=====
Konstantin Priblouda ( ko5tik )    Freelance Software developer
< http://www.pribluda.de > < play java games -> http://www.yook.de >
< render charts online -> http://www.pribluda.de/povray/ >

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Tax Center - online filing with TurboTax
http://taxes.yahoo.com/

_______________________________________________
Xdoclet-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-devel

Reply via email to