It seems relations-ascii-art and HTML don't want to play together. I repost the 7 relations FYI (The # means arrow end):
1--#1 1--#n 1#--n 1#-#1 1#-#n n--#n n#-#n Aslak (thread moved from middlegen-user to xdoclet-devel) > -----Original Message----- > From: Steve Knight [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 11. april 2002 22:45 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: RE: [Xdoclet-user] Data Object vs Value Object > > > Well, I have around 17 tables in my project (all beans generated by > Middlegen - Thank you!) and as I go along I am uncovering bugs, > which I have > posted here, and most have been patched by Marcus or Vincent. > I am using these relationships, so far: > 1<->1 > 1<->n > 1<--n > > The bi-directional relationships are currently a problem because > you can get > circular references. I got around this by excluding the cmr field on one > end of the relationship. Of course, then you lose the ability to navigate > the relation from that end! > > Steve > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Hicks, James" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: "Marcus Brito" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Lista XDoclet-User" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 2:01 PM > Subject: Re: RE: [Xdoclet-user] Data Object vs Value Object > > > Just a suggestion for testing and debugging this value baby: Use > Middlegen. With 8 related tables you'll get 7 relationships, right? > That's enough to cover all combinations of cardinality and > directionality: > > 1-->1 > 1-->n > > m-->m > m<->m > > > It would be error prone and painful to code all these test classes > (which you do need indeed) by hand. Make your life easier and your code > better. > > You'll have to edit the entity-cmp.j template in Middlegen in order to > make it generate value objects (isn't value _classes_ more correct?). > > Middlegen/XDoclet will stress the value object to the max with all > these combinations. There should be some JUnit tests to test it too. > This stuff is too complex for ad hoc testing. > > (This would go to Vincent too if I had his email handy, but I don't. > He'll read it anyway). > > Regards, > Aslak > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Hicks, James" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Thursday, April 11, 2002 5:34 pm > Subject: RE: [Xdoclet-user] Data Object vs Value Object > > > I was unaware that anyone was fixing it to work with CMP2. The > > last i heard > > was that no special work was going to be performed to make it work > > withcmp2. I have a CVS snapshot from about 2 weeks ago. > > > > Here is one build setup I use that causes errors with the version of > > valueobject that im using: > > - bean class has 1-n relationship with another bean (CMR) > > - the other bean is already built and packaged. > > - xdoclet generates cmp implementation for bean, local home and > > local object > > interfaces > > - the bean class declares the getValueObject and setValueObject > > methods as > > abstract. > > - xdoclet generates the value object for the bean. it includes the > > valueobjects for the 1-n relationship > > - when xdoclet goes to generate the cmp implementation with get > > and set > > methods, it croaks. Since it has been a week since I worked with > > it, i > > don't remember the exact error message. But the error is caused > > when it > > trys to write the update*, add*, and remove methods in the bean > > for the > > relationship. > > > > When i get home tonight, i will run it and email the stack trace. > > I will > > also get the latest CVS and try it. > > > > > > > > > > > > James Hicks > > C.A.D.G. - Application Developer > > BERRYDirect > > Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Phone: 936.462.4655 > > Fax: 936.462.4655 > > Pager: 936.568.4296 > > I-Pager: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Marcus Brito [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 9:54 PM > > To: Lista XDoclet-User > > Subject: RE: [Xdoclet-user] Data Object vs Value Object > > > > > > Em Qua, 2002-04-10 ŕs 21:26, Hicks, James escreveu: > > > > > If you are working with CMP 2.0, valueobject subtask in XDoclet > > will not > > > work. I am currently working on a patch for this, which > > hopefully, if > > > everything goes right, will be finished this coming weekend. > > > > Hey, it DOES work. I've put some effort into Value Objects > > recently and > > I think that the current state is OK for CMP2. If you find > > anything that > > doesn't work, file a bug on sourceforge.net and someone (me or > > vincent,probably) should take care of it. > > > > I'm even using the VO task in my own project (w/ CMP2). > > > > -- > > Pazu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > Anime Gaiden - De făs para făs, sempre. > > http://www.animegaiden.com.br > > > > "The information transmitted is intended only for the person or > > entity to > > which it is addressed and may contain confidential, proprietary, > > and/orprivileged material. Any review, retransmission, > > dissemination, or other use > > of, or taking of, any action in reliance upon this information by > > persons or > > entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you > > receivedthis in error, please contact the sender and delete the > > material from all > > computers." > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Xdoclet-user mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-user > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Xdoclet-user mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-user > _______________________________________________ Xdoclet-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-devel
