Hi, > It's less than 2 times slower on my machine. I suspected what > makes it slow but it turned out I was wrong when I was > testing last night. I need to do some profiling to find out > the bottleneck. But anyway I'm sure we can optimize it and > make it definitely faster than forked mode.
Is AntClassLoader "too" clever, "too" dynamic ? I mean having the system class loader taking care of xjavadoc classes would suffice no? That would mean having xjavadoc.jar in build.bat classpath. That is what junit does. Why can't we make it like that ? And possibly xdoclet.jar also. The modules would be dynamically loaded. > > So I take the oppertunity to define a schedule for 1.2: > - we'll provide a beta1 in 2 weeks or so. Honestly I found > some bad bugs and some other bad bugs are still there. > Hopefully we will fix the performance problem for beta1. And > we'll also move all the optional stuff to their correct place. > - we'll provide a beta2 in 2 weeks or so after beta1. This > one fixes bugs and also moving all cmp persistence mapping > stuff to use ejb:persistence tag. > - And 1.2final shortly after that. > > Agree? Yes! > > Ara. > > --- Vincent Harcq <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > The build samples is now 4 times slower. > > This is unacceptable really. > > I am not familiar at all with class loading... > > Is there anything we can do to avoid that ? > > The problem comes maybe from AntClassLoader because even before your > > changes setting fork to false (and xmlvalidation to false) did slow > > the > > build a lot. > > Regards, > > Vincent > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Xdoclet-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-devel > > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Tax Center - online filing with TurboTax http://taxes.yahoo.com/ _______________________________________________ Xdoclet-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-devel
