User: ko5tik
Date: 02/04/19 09:06:34
Modified: core/src/xdoclet XDocletTagSupport.java
Log:
fixed xjavadoc junit test problem
forAllMethodTags behaved incorreclty for cases where no tag
parameter was requested.
But this stuff needs streamlining & refactoring.
Really guys, it's terrible now :)
Revision Changes Path
1.39 +7 -1 xdoclet/core/src/xdoclet/XDocletTagSupport.java
Index: XDocletTagSupport.java
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/xdoclet/xdoclet/core/src/xdoclet/XDocletTagSupport.java,v
retrieving revision 1.38
retrieving revision 1.39
diff -u -w -r1.38 -r1.39
--- XDocletTagSupport.java 18 Apr 2002 19:15:19 -0000 1.38
+++ XDocletTagSupport.java 19 Apr 2002 16:06:34 -0000 1.39
@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@
*
* @author Dmitri Colebatch ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
* @created October 12, 2001
- * @version $Revision: 1.38 $
+ * @version $Revision: 1.39 $
*/
public abstract class XDocletTagSupport extends TemplateTagHandler
{
@@ -408,6 +408,12 @@
if( for_type == FOR_METHOD && getCurrentMethodTag() != null &&
getCurrentMethodTag().name().equals( tag_name ) && Arrays.asList(
getCurrentMethodTag().attributeValueNames() ).contains( param_name ) )
{
return getCurrentMethodTag().attributeValue( param_name );
+ }
+ else if( for_type == FOR_METHOD && getCurrentMethodTag() != null &&
getCurrentMethodTag().name().equals( tag_name ) && ( param_name == null || param_num
== null ) )
+ {
+ // somebody is just interested in tag contens.
+ // return whole
+ return getCurrentMethodTag().value();
}
else if( for_type == FOR_CLASS && getCurrentClassTag() != null )
{
_______________________________________________
Xdoclet-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-devel
