----- Original Message -----
From: Dmitri Colebatch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Monday, June 10, 2002 11:32 am
Subject: [Xdoclet-devel] CVS update:
xdoclet/modules/ejb/src/xdoclet/modules/ejb/dd RelationTagsHandler.java
> User: dimc
> Date: 02/06/10 02:32:16
>
> Modified: modules/ejb/src/xdoclet/modules/ejb/dd
> RelationTagsHandler.java
> Log:
> Uncommented what looks to be something that was commented out
> temporarily in the midst of the XJavadoc refactoring (the change
> to javabean
> compliance by the looks).
>
Nope. This is something I did a looong time ago:
http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-
bin/viewcvs.cgi/xdoclet/xdoclet/core/src/xdoclet/ejb/tags/Attic/Relation
TagsHandler.java?rev=1.20.2.3&content-type=text/vnd.viewcvs-markup
AND
http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-
bin/viewcvs.cgi/xdoclet/xdoclet/core/src/xdoclet/ejb/tags/Attic/Relation
TagsHandler.java?rev=1.20.2.2&content-type=text/vnd.viewcvs-markup
So I think you should revert your latest change until a proper bug-
report is filed.
> Could someone please check that there isn't a reason this was still
> commented out? I found it was required in a uni-directional n-1
> relationship otherwise the target-ejb params were ignored.
>
AFAIK all combinations of directionality and cardinality are working
now (well, before your changes, Dim). If someone disagrees, please show
me the code to prove I'm wrong.
-And sorry for having left this old code lying around. I know it's
confusing...
Aslak
_______________________________________________________________
Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference
August 25-28 in Las Vegas -
http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm?source=osdntextlink
_______________________________________________
Xdoclet-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-devel
