Here's a message regarding XDoclet failing during Gump builds, which also prevents several dependents from building.
----- Original Message ----- From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Ant Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 12:38 AM Subject: Re: Fw: [Xdoclet-devel] @tags and javadoc 1.4 warnings > Erik, > > Are you involved in the xdoclet project ? Can you take a look at gump > status, and maybe do something about it ? All tomcats are now failing > since mx4j depends on xdoclet. > > ( it seems a very usefull tool, I plan to use it in connectors, > and I think it would be usefull for ant task development and many > other things ) > > Costin > > On Mon, 17 Jun 2002, Erik Hatcher wrote: > > > Here's a message from an XDoclet developer, and there is a comment at the > > end (directed to me) regarding the nested <tag> of <javadoc>..... thoughts? > > Is this a bug? > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Andrew Stevens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Monday, June 17, 2002 6:34 PM > > Subject: [Xdoclet-devel] @tags and javadoc 1.4 warnings > > > > > > > Something I was wondering about earlier... > > > > > > The ejb.tags format was added so that javadoc 1.4 can be told to ignore > > > our custom tags with the -tag option. However, we do have quite a lot of > > > them so typing them all in by hand is likely to be laborious and error > > > prone. Since they're all described in the xtags, how about somewhere in > > > the documentation generating a list of them all suitable for cut & paste > > > into the -tag command line argument? > > > > > > Also, since such a list is likely to exceed the maximum command line > > > length on many systems, perhaps we should also/instead generate a file > > > containing them on separate -tag lines for including with @argfile (as > > > described under "Example of a complete set of tags" at > > > http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4/docs/tooldocs/windows/javadoc.html#tag )? > > > > > > Lastly, I see that Ant 1.5's javadoc task supports <tag> nested elements; > > > it might be a good idea if we generated a list of them all in this format > > > too, so that they can be included in Ant scripts with just an entity > > > declaration. > > > > > > By the way, Erik (resident Ant expert), any idea why the description > > > attribute of tag nested elements is required? (according to the docs at > > > http://jakarta.apache.org/ant/manual/CoreTasks/javadoc.html#tagelement ) > > > The javadoc docs include examples "-tag param", "-tag example:X", etc. > > > which suggests to me it should be optional? > > > > > > > > > Andrew. > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > -- > > > Bringing you mounds of caffeinated joy > > > >>> http://thinkgeek.com/sf <<< > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Xdoclet-devel mailing list > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-devel > > > > > > > > > -- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Bringing you mounds of caffeinated joy >>> http://thinkgeek.com/sf <<< _______________________________________________ Xdoclet-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-devel
