Wow, ok... ConfigParamIntrospector. I had no idea we were doing stuff
like that under the hood. Now could someone explain to me where and why
that is used to do bean getter lookups?
I suspect there is a bug in there that is stripping the dots or not
doing the proper name lookup for a simple String config param. I guess
its now time to figure out XDoclet's unit tests and write one to
identify this one.
Erik
Erik Hatcher wrote:
> Ok, I have more clues. Here's what I'm trying to do:
>
> <deploymentdescriptor validatexml="true"
> destdir="${build.dir}/${site}">
> <configParam name="web.security.mode" value="basic"/>
> </deploymentdescriptor>
>
> And in web-security.xml I'm using the config parameter to control which
> authentication mode is enabled. BASIC is nice for Cactus tests, but
> sucks for production sites, so thats one of the reasons for doing this.
>
> I thought perhaps the dots in my parameter name might be causing the
> problem, and sure enough as soon as I changed it to name="security" it
> worked.
>
> Is there a reason we don't allow dots in configuration parameter names?
> I'll have to dig into the code to see where this is happening, but it
> seems unnecessary for us to be stripping the name, right?
>
> Erik
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Xdoclet-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-devel
