Bugs item #533515, was opened at 2002-03-22 10:37
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=402704&aid=533515&group_id=31602

Category: webdoclet
Group: v1.1.2
>Status: Closed
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Assigned to: Mathias Bogaert (pathoss)
Summary: strutsconfigxml, different forwards

Initial Comment:
If a single Struts Action-Class shall be used multiple 
in different Action-Mappings (what Struts supports), 
it is possible to add multiple '@struts:action=' tags 
within the Action-Class. XDoclet will then produce 
multiple <action>...</action> elements in the
struts-config.xml. This is ok.

But it is not possible to assign for those different 
action-mappings also different lists of 'forwards'. 
All forwards are assigned to all action-mappings.

It would be a good thing, if one can specify different 
lists of forwards for every action-mapping listet in 
the Action-Class.

Oliver Henning


----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Konstantin Pribluda (ko5tik)
Date: 2002-10-03 18:06

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=91100

This issue was moved to JIRA under ID XDT-26
URL:
http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/xdoclet/secure/ViewIssue.jspa?id=10055

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Date: 2002-09-16 09:36

Message:
Logged In: NO 

To specify a little more my problem: You often have one 
normal forward in a workflow, e.g. forward "success". 
Now if you have a useful action, which can be used in 
different situations (e.g. fill a list in the Form-Bean from 
a DB, where Bean-Property and Table-Name can be 
configured by the acion-mapping-parameter), the you 
need it in more than one action-mapping. At the end, 
the action makes a return mapping.findForward
("success"), where different JSPs shall be shown for the 
different mappings.

So, different forwards have to have different names 
(global or not), and therefore the solution via global 
forwards is not fine.

Oliver Henning


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Andrew Stevens (stevensa)
Date: 2002-09-15 17:46

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=247081

Any suggestions, Oliver, or can we assume that the global-
forwards.xml merge point is the best solution and close this 
issue?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Brian Topping (topping)
Date: 2002-08-13 06:41

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=99236

Can this be done with global forwards?

I can't think of an implementation of this that is not really 
confusing to the user.  If global forwards are not sufficient, 
can you propose some tag structures that you would like to 
see that don't make things really confusing?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=402704&aid=533515&group_id=31602


-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Xdoclet-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-devel

Reply via email to