User: erikhatcher
  Date: 02/10/06 07:22:29

  Modified:    modules/apache/src/xdoclet/modules/apache/struts/resources
                        validation_xml.xdt
  Log:
  fix for @struts.validator tags with some having msgkey, some not.  seems a bit 
confusing, but at least this patch fixes the issue.
  
  Revision  Changes    Path
  1.3       +58 -56    
xdoclet/modules/apache/src/xdoclet/modules/apache/struts/resources/validation_xml.xdt
  
  Index: validation_xml.xdt
  ===================================================================
  RCS file: 
/cvsroot/xdoclet/xdoclet/modules/apache/src/xdoclet/modules/apache/struts/resources/validation_xml.xdt,v
  retrieving revision 1.2
  retrieving revision 1.3
  diff -u -w -r1.2 -r1.3
  --- validation_xml.xdt        9 Sep 2002 23:32:55 -0000       1.2
  +++ validation_xml.xdt        6 Oct 2002 14:22:29 -0000       1.3
  @@ -21,11 +21,13 @@
           <XDtValidator:forAllFields>
                 <field property="<XDtValidator:fieldName/>"
                        depends="<XDtValidator:validatorList/>">
  +                <XDtMethod:forAllMethodTags tagName="struts:validator">
                   <XDtMethod:ifHasMethodTag tagName="struts:validator" 
paramName="msgkey">
                     <msg
                       name="<XDtMethod:methodTagValue tagName="struts:validator" 
paramName="type"/>"
                       key="<XDtMethod:methodTagValue tagName="struts:validator" 
paramName="msgkey"/>"/>
                   </XDtMethod:ifHasMethodTag>
  +                </XDtMethod:forAllMethodTags>
   
                   <XDtValidator:ifNoArg0>
                     <arg0 key="<XDtClass:classTagValue tagName="struts:form" 
paramName="name"/>.<XDtValidator:fieldName/>"/>
  
  
  


-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Xdoclet-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-devel

Reply via email to