> > Yes. Remove it. Those who don't have the right IDEA won't need it; > > They have it. > > I suggest you add a README.txt where you enumerate the build numbers > > you have tested it on. > > And I believe it's not legal to distribute the jar anyway. nah I checked that... http://www.intellij.net/forums/thread.jsp?forum=6&thread=11511&tstart=0&tran ge=50 and http://www.intellij.net/forums/thread.jsp?forum=23&thread=11564&tstart=0&tra nge=50
but its removed now... > Btw, > <property name="intellij.plugin.dir" value="C:/programs/intellij.648/plugins"/> > > Ouch! This is in the build.xml file. Would you please make it a bit more > parametric? Move it to a properties file, or even better: if user > defines it via ant -Dblabla=c:\dada\idea then use it otherwise prompt > the user with Ant's <input/> task. so question on this... pardon my ant ignorance, but whats the best approach. If I put it in a build.properties file and read props from that, that file goes into cvs yes, and people have to modify that to suit their system? or do I put a commented version of the build.properties in, and people modify that? (sorry again for such a stupid question....) > So what are the steps to build and use it? A readme file? I _did_ have a readme file - although I moved it into the docs... I thought I then realised that the readme was required and put it back... but appeartly not (o: keep an eye on the cvs commits, it'll come back soon. cheers dim ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Xdoclet-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-devel
