A wise old hermit known only as =?iso-8859-1?Q?Aslak_Helles=F8y?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> once said:
> My point is that I think we should settle on something even more generic > than @jdo and @ejb, because the information we put in these tags is the > same. IMO it should be @sql, @jdbc or @rdbms. > > Further, I think we should stick to namespaces (dotted tag names) for > the > sake of consistency. Who knows, they might have a programmatic sense one > day, and it would be a shame if we invented lots of "namespace-less" > tags. More than that, the standard 1.4 javadoc complains about any custom tags that don't contain a '.' as they could possibly conflict with future standard tags. I'm getting fed up seeing it complain about @todo's as it is, let's not give it any more to moan about :-) Andrew. ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by: viaVerio will pay you up to $1,000 for every account that you consolidate with us. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;4749864;7604308;v? http://www.viaverio.com/consolidator/osdn.cfm _______________________________________________ Xdoclet-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-devel
