On Mon, 26 Apr 2004, Andrew Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 2004-04-26 at 07:44, Rupp, Heiko wrote: >> Can't any of the gump guys tell us, what they expect? > > It doesn't appear to be the same problem.
In this case, I'm sorry about my last post. I really should have checked the logs instead of assuming it was the old problem. > Instead it's complaining about some other setting which isn't > present :-( Is it possible to add this setting without breaking the old version? Sorry, I don't know anything about prettyprinter. Another option would be a property that Gump could set (or even a special target) in order to build xdoclet without running prettyprinter at all. Add an unless="gump.build" to the targets with the prettyprinter task and we could change Gump to set this property, for example. Stefan ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: The Robotic Monkeys at ThinkGeek For a limited time only, get FREE Ground shipping on all orders of $35 or more. Hurry up and shop folks, this offer expires April 30th! http://www.thinkgeek.com/freeshipping/?cpg=12297 _______________________________________________ xdoclet-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-devel
