Matt:
Just tried this again and didn't have any luck. On Wed, 22 Sep 2004 11:18:56 -0600, Matt Raible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Did you try putting an @struts.validator tag (w/ no attributes) on the > parent objects setter? I believe that is the workaround that Erik > suggested. > > Matt > > > > On Sep 22, 2004, at 9:53 AM, Nick Heudecker wrote: > > > Matt, > > > > Putting the validation tags on the nested object's properties creates > > validation XML, but the properties are not prefixed with the name of > > the parent object's property name. So you get this: > > > > <field property="address1" depends="required"> > > <arg0 key="home.address.1"/> > > </field> > > > > Instead of: > > > > <field property="homeAddress.address1" depends="required"> > > <arg0 key="home.address.1"/> > > </field> > > > > > > On Wed, 22 Sep 2004 09:40:36 -0600, Matt Raible > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> +1 for a release and +1 for a few days for Nick to figure this stuff > >> out > >> below. I believe Erik Hatcher knows how to do it. Currently, I think > >> you have to put a @struts.validator tag on the setter of the nested > >> object and then the children will be picked up. If that works, it > >> would > >> be nice to eliminate that step. I'll try to look at this myself in > >> the > >> next couple of days. > >> > >> Matt > >> > >> > >> > >> Nick Heudecker wrote: > >> > >>> I would really like to be able to have the Struts validator code > >>> validate nested properties for the 1.2.2 release. If anyone has > >>> suggestions about how to accomplish this, please let me know. Here's > >>> the original email: > >>> > >>> http://www.mail-archive.com/xdoclet-devel%40lists.sourceforge.net/ > >>> msg16038.html > >>> > >>> > >>> On Wed, 22 Sep 2004 12:02:37 +0200, Rene Zanner > >>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>>> Hi folks, > >>>> > >>>> + 1 from me, too. > >>>> > >>>> Cheers, > >>>> > >>>> Ren� > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>> -----Urspr�ngliche Nachricht----- > >>>>> Von: Heiko W. Rupp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>>> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 22. September 2004 09:13 > >>>>> An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; > >>>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]; > >>>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; > >>>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; > >>>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]; > >>>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>>> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; > >>>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]; > >>>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; > >>>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; > >>>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; > >>>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]; > >>>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>>> Betreff: Xdoclet 1.2.2 release ? > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> Hi fellow developers, > >>>>> > >>>>> I'd like to see a Xdoclet 1.2.2 out end of this month, following > >>>>> the > >>>>> principle 'release often'. We did quite a good job since 1.2.1 > >>>>> closing > >>>>> over 50 bugs and adding support for ws4ee and java server faces. > >>>>> > >>>>> There is one thing, but I don't consider this a problem, if a > >>>>> subsequent > >>>>> 1.3 release won't take too long then: > >>>>> - support for Jdk 5 features / grammar > >>>>> > >>>>> I did look into it, but this is nothing that one can fix in a few > >>>>> minutes. > >>>>> > >>>>> So I'd propose to 'freeze' cvs now, putting a 1.2.2 tag on it. > >>>>> Then testing by us developers starts. Checkins are only ok if this > >>>>> fixes a direct regression (no more jira bug closing) and then the > >>>>> tag is moved forward. > >>>>> In a week from now, the release will be built and cvs is open for > >>>>> checkin again. > >>>>> > >>>>> What do you think? > >>>>> > >>>>> Andrew: would you build the release? > >>>>> > >>>>> Cheers > >>>>> Heiko > >>>>> will only be moved forward if > >>>>> > >>>>> -- > >>>>> Heiko W.Rupp [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>>> http://www.pilhuhn.de/hwr/ > >>>>> See http://mcntp.sourceforge.net/ for Multicast NetNews Transport > >>>>> Protocol > >>>>> See http://www.jboss.org/ for a powerfull J2EE server > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >> > >> ------------------------------------------------------- > >> This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170 > >> Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement > >> on > >> who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM. > >> Deadline: Sept. 24. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php > >> _______________________________________________ > >> xdoclet-devel mailing list > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-devel > >> > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170 > > Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on > > who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM. > > Deadline: Sept. 24. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php > > _______________________________________________ > > xdoclet-devel mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-devel > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170 > Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on > who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM. > Deadline: Sept. 24. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php > _______________________________________________ > xdoclet-devel mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-devel > ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170 Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM. Deadline: Sept. 24. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php _______________________________________________ xdoclet-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-devel
