--- John Latham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > There is a fundamental question for the plugin: is > it a goal to have tag > compatibility with XDoclet1?
Mostly yes. But due to different feature set, and a fact that xdoclet-1 developers insist on developing it further, instead to switch to XD-2 plugins it is not always possible... XD2 tags follow DTD more closely ( as good possible, because hibenate DTD is changing at amazing pace ) > Of course, if compatability is a design goal, then > how will the > evolution of the XDoclet1 and XDoclet2 plugins be > kept in step? Are the > XDoclet1 plugins still under active development? As said before, XD1 developers are not eager to move on on XD2 plugins and continue to develop XD1, besides the fact that XD1 has no tag validation and formal definition and templating language is a bitch ( though jelly guys feel that they were inspired by it, I'm still asking why :) ) regards, ----[ Konstantin Pribluda ( ko5tik ) ]---------------- ... Auf der Suche nach einen Projekt in Rhein-Main ab 18.4.2005 ----[ http://www.pribluda.de ]------------------------ __________________________________ Yahoo! Mail Mobile Take Yahoo! Mail with you! Check email on your mobile phone. http://mobile.yahoo.com/learn/mail ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: NEC IT Guy Games. Get your fingers limbered up and give it your best shot. 4 great events, 4 opportunities to win big! Highest score wins.NEC IT Guy Games. Play to win an NEC 61 plasma display. Visit http://www.necitguy.com/?r=20 _______________________________________________ xdoclet-plugins-interest mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-plugins-interest
