--- Grégory Joseph <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > In deed, our tagged snapshots are not there > > anymore.... > > though there is a shitload of ones from 2003. > > ( ibiblio did frühjahrputz? ) > > > > I think it was Diogo, who was in close contact > with > > jelly > > folks... > > > > Shall we also fork jelly and put it into our repo? > > ( I still have those snapshots in my local repo ) > > or will you try to use released ones? > > We can't use the 1.0 versions, since they don't have > the xsd stuff > that Diogo added to them :/ > > Maybe postpone the release until Diogo gave us his > insight on this, I > suppose he knows more of release plans from jelly ? We'll have to do this... no point in forcing people into non-existent dependency. regards, ----[ Konstantin Pribluda http://www.pribluda.de ]---------------- Still using XDoclet 1.x? XDoclet 2 is released and of production quality. check it out: http://xdoclet.codehaus.org __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click _______________________________________________ xdoclet-plugins-interest mailing list xdoclet-plugins-interest@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-plugins-interest
