--- "Diogo Quintela (EF)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> glup, > common-jelly core can't be 1.0 > must be timestamp based that is at > http://cvs.apache.org/repository/commons-jelly/jars/ > (i'll update url in > project.xml) Well, since you are in tight contact with jelly folks, you are the most qualified person to resolve jelly dependencies :) > I am recompiling all this to have a complete set. > btw, what do you all think about removing those > build.xml > around testapp's ? Some of those have the jar's > totally out of sync with > project.xml :| Harmonizing dependencies would not harm... Do we really need those testaps as examples? Probably yes... regards, ----[ Konstantin Pribluda http://www.pribluda.de ]---------------- Still using XDoclet 1.x? XDoclet 2 is released and of production quality. check it out: http://xdoclet.codehaus.org __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click _______________________________________________ xdoclet-plugins-interest mailing list xdoclet-plugins-interest@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-plugins-interest
