Clarance, is it a bug or functionality? its definately known about. Just recently we've been having a discussion on dev about these sorts of issues. I'm assuming you would like XDoclet to completely ignore any ejbs without @ejb:bean comments? Another option we've considered is to generate stuff based on a set of "smart defaults".
To be honest, I didn't know this had changed since 1.0 (I thought it changed before that). The only work-around I can suggest is to change your build.xml to exclude the base bean(s). As a side note though - XDoclet will generate whatever methods are required for the ejbspec (empty implementations), so if that's all you're using the base class for, you may be able to discard it (o: cheers dim On Wed, 31 Oct 2001, Clarance Howatt wrote: > I tried to upgrade from version 1.0 to the CVS version of XDoclet > (downloaded this morning). > > I have about 100 EJBeans and all of them inherit from a BasicEntityBean. > The BasicEntityBean is just a convenience bean so that I do not have to > define all of the methods defined by the EJB spec. Under 1.0 everything was > working great (thanks for making my life so easy). > > Now for the bad news, when I try and run the latest version of XDoclet, I > get the following error: > > [ejbdoclet] (TemplateEngine.invokeMethod 710 ) Invoking method > failed: p > arentDataObjectClass , line=9 of template file: \xdoclet\ejb\dataobject.j > [ejbdoclet] xdoclet.XDocletException: @ejb:bean class tag expected in class > com. > yottayotta.ejb.BasicEntityBean but not found. > > Now I know that all of my entity beans must include the @ejb:bean tag and > all of the beans that I wish to run XDoclet with do have this tag. The > BasicEntityBean does NOT have the @ejb:bean tag but that is by design. I do > not want anything generated based on this file and it has been excluded in > the ant build file. And remember, It was working under 1.0. > > This behaviour can be reproduced in the samples that come with xdoclet by > simple removing the @ejb:bean tag from person.java (make sure you exclude > this file in the build.xml file) > > Is this a bug or new functionality? > > C. > > > > _______________________________________________ > Xdoclet-user mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-user > _______________________________________________ Xdoclet-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-user
