I am trying to port the app written for jboss to xdoclet+jboss.
So the class is already there and I don't want to change the code to
use the generated dataobject. However, I give it a try to modify the
template
which generates jaws.xml to do what I want it to do and I will post a patch.

Thanks!

Michael.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Clarance Howatt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Michael Larionov'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 10:50 AM
Subject: RE: [Xdoclet-user] jdbc-type and sql-type for @jboss:cmp-field


> I have not done what you are trying so I don't know if there is a way to
> make it work.
>
> If, however, what you are trying to do is use the value object pattern to
> get and set data, xdoclet does this for you.  Simple include the getters
and
> setters for the persistent fields the way that you normally do.  If you
> don't want direct access to the getters and setters don't put them in the
> interface.  Now all you have to do is include the <dataobject\> element to
> the ant script.  This will have the result of generating the dataobject
for
> you, with all the getters and setters as well as including a getdata and
> setdata method in the bean.
>
> Just a thought
> C.
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Michael Larionov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 5:59 PM
> > To: Xdoclet mailing list
> > Subject: Fw: [Xdoclet-user] jdbc-type and sql-type for
> > @jboss:cmp-field
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > Yes, but not with the fields of a dependent value object.
> > > In that case I have to use @jboss:cmp-field.
> > >
> > > I have the following situation: the field in an EJB is an
> > object with the
> > > cmp-fields
> > > which corresopnd to the database fields. Corresopndingly I use the
> > > doclet @jboss:cmp-field which is a class doclet rather than a method
> > doclet.
> > > Now, where should I put @jboss:sql-type and @jboss:jdbc-type?
> > > In the fields of a dependent value class?
> > >
> > > The code looks like this:
> > >
> > > public abstract class UserBean extends EntityBean {
> > >
> > >      /**
> > >  * @ejb:persistent-field
> > >  * @ejb:interface-method
> > >  * @jboss:not-persisted-field
> > >  */
> > >     public abstract void setUserData(UserData newData);
> > >      /**
> > >  * @ejb:persistent-field
> > >  * @ejb:interface-method
> > >  * @jboss:not-persisted-field
> > >  */
> > >     public abstract UserData getUserdata();
> > >
> > > }
> > >
> > > public class UserData implements Serializable {
> > >     public String firstName;
> > >     public String lastName;
> > >     public Time wakeUpAt;
> > > }
> > >
> > > Now, the database stores not a serialized UserData object
> > but its fields,
> > so
> > > it looks like:
> > > table users:
> > >     id
> > >     first_name
> > >     last_name
> > >     wake_up_at
> > >
> > > Of course, I used the doclet tag:
> > >
> > > @jboss:cmp-field field-name="data.firstName"
> > column-name="first_name"
> > >
> > > which works fine, but for wake_up_at I need to tell jaws additional
> > > information, like
> > > jdbc-type and sql-type, so I would expect the tag to look like:
> > >
> > > @jboss:cmp-field field-name="wakeUpAt"
> > >           column-name="wake_up_at"
> > >          jdbc-type="TIME"
> > >          sql-type="TIME"
> > >
> > > Is there any other way?
> > >
> > > Thanks!
> > >
> > > Michael.
> > >
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Clarance Howatt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > To: "'Michael Larionov'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 5:15 PM
> > > Subject: RE: [Xdoclet-user] jdbc-type and sql-type for
> > @jboss:cmp-field
> > >
> > >
> > > > It is.  We do it all the time.
> > > >
> > > > @jboss:sql-type
> > > > @jboss:jdbc-type
> > > >
> > > > C.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: Michael Larionov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > > > Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 3:09 PM
> > > > > To: Xdoclet mailing list
> > > > > Subject: [Xdoclet-user] jdbc-type and sql-type for
> > @jboss:cmp-field
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > I am wondering why isn't it possible to specify jdbc-type abd
> > > > > sql-type for
> > > > > @jboss:cmp-field.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks!
> > > > >
> > > > > Michael.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > Xdoclet-user mailing list
> > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-user
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Xdoclet-user mailing list
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-user
> >


_______________________________________________
Xdoclet-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-user

Reply via email to