On Sat, 8 Dec 2001, James Higginbotham wrote: > I just obtained the latest CVS about 10 minutes ago, built it, > replaced the jar with the new one, and discovered that none of my > ejbCreate() methods are being honored. I just built the samples and > noticed the same thing. Anyone else seeing this?
yes... just checked - you're right. I should apologise... haven't been using entity beans recently, so not sure when this happened... perhaps someone else can provide some feedback... > I am also seeing a problem with CMPs that only have a local interface > not getting the <local> and <localhome> entries generated in their > ejb-jar.xml file. Anyone seeing this as well? that one looks ok... check out test.ejb.cmr.CityLocal in the samples... think of anything that might be setting this off? > I'm getting a bit frustrated with trying to use this tool, though the > goals are honorable. I am concerned that there are no regression tests > being performed to ensure that the most basic concepts, such as > create() methods, are continuing to be generated. It also prevents > quick determination of whether WebLogic and JBoss support is broken or > not. Am I missing something with your project, or is this the case? If > so, what are the plans for implementing unit tests and other forms of > regression testing when introducing new features or bug fixes? we've talked about testing several times, but its difficult to know where to draw the line, and dare I say it, this is possiblity XDoclet's biggest weakness (although I'm happy for any of the other developers to argue otherwise). When I develop, I will test that the sample application deploys on JBoss... up till recently I've only checked 2.4, but have now got it working on 3.0alpha as well. I think if we had a test suite to run post deploy it would be great, but as we all have our own apps that typically have that support, its not in the XDoclet cvs... if you were interested in writing something like that it would certainly be welcomed with open arms (o: > Currently, I am spending more time getting around XDoclet 'features' > than writing code - I hope this will change, as I don't want to > abandon XDoclet unless it is necessary. bear with us... the create methods should be a quick fix... Ara - looking at the template, I can see why they're not there... I'm not going to have a look now, but I thought we use to have a "isCreateMethod" tag somewhere... will look more tomorrow... cheers dim _______________________________________________ Xdoclet-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-user
