A feature I'd like to see is for the vendor tasks to start supporting a generic "column" tag. Right now, I need to do:
@jboss:column-name name="id" @orion:persistence persistence-name="id" To declare for orion and jboss that the column for that value be named "id". I think we can still keep support for this, but why add: @ejb:column-name name="id" Yes, I know technically there is no concept of a "column name" in the standard ejb-jar.xml, so putting it in the ejb namespace might suck, but basically, the idea is to get all the <vendor>.j files to agree on a way to specify these column names as possible. This would allow for my EJBs to support app servers that I didn't even plan on. In fact, this idea could be extended further even, such as table-name, and auto-create-table and auto-remove-table. I suppose this list would have to be limited to a common subset the major of the vendor tasks support though. Thoughts? -Pat _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp _______________________________________________ Xdoclet-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-user
