RE: [Xdoclet-user] Generation Bug?

[Ara Abrahamian]

Title: Generation Bug?

I think somewhere it does a isGetter() and works on it if true. Ok there it is: xdoclet.ejb.tags.PersistentTagsHandler line 96. It’s used anywhere isPersistentField is used. I’m not sure whether removing it is safe or not, but anyway you can do it yourself atm.   Ara. -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Nortje, Andrew Sent: Friday, January 25, 2002 9:19 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: [Xdoclet-user] Generation Bug?   All over my current code, which I wrote before discovering XDoclet, I have getters and setters like this String firstName() void setFirstName(  String Name ) i.e. my getter does not have get in it, so firstName() instead of getFirstName() (I like this cause the code looks kinda cleaner. I also do know that get and set is java beans convention, EJB does not however require get and set) XDoclet does not generate the <cmp-field> entry in ejb-jar.xml if the method is NOT getBlahBlah(), even if I move the tags to the setBlahBalh() method. So this does not work. The jboss jaws.xml output is fine though.     /**      * @ejb:interface-method      * @ejb:persistent-field      * @jboss:cmp-field field-name="firstName" column-name="first"         */     public String firstName() {         return( this.firstName );     } Is this a feature or a bug? Could XDoclet not be made a little smarter to figure this out? Thanks Andrew