I don't know anything about how XDoclet variables work, but if they aren't
immutable, you could do the equivalent of

append method name (
sep = ""
loop
 append sep <next variable>
 sep = ", "
end loop

david jencks

On 2002.02.20 07:45:47 -0500 "Shaw, Chris" wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I was thinking along the lines of having a 'string-only'
> constructor....in
> addition to the current one(s)...(maybe it is better, if parsing through
> XML, to just call a set method for each parameter as they are found
> anyway
> but...)
> 
> So I was working on the premise that I would need a comma-separated list
> as
> the arguments passed in...
>    public ObjectData(java.lang.String paramOne, java.lang.String
> paramTwo,
> etc)
> 
> and then in this constructor, as you suggested, I would simply call
> overriden methods (for which the arguments are obviously not already a
> String as they don't need to be overriden).
> 
> The problem here is knowing which argument is the last one and hence not
> printing the last comma....
> 
> C.
> --
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dmitri Colebatch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 20 February 2002 13:32
> To: Shaw, Chris; 'xdoclet-user'
> Subject: Re: [Xdoclet-user] Data Object and Strings
> 
> 
> Why not
> 
> <XDtEjbPersistent:forAllPersistentFields superclasses="false">
>    java.lang.String <XDtMethod:propertyName/>AsString;
> </XDtEjbPersistent:forAllPersistentFields>)
> 
> also remember that if this is to go in the dataobject class, you will
> have
> namespace issues if you use <XDtMethod:propertyName /> - hence my
> appending
> of 'AsString' to the name.
> 
> cheers
> dim
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Shaw, Chris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "'xdoclet-user'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2002 8:42 PM
> Subject: RE: [Xdoclet-user] Data Object and Strings
> 
> 
> > Hi,
> >
> > Quick question...(?)
> > Is it possible to do something like the following? (or am I tackling it
> > wrong?)
> >
> > (<XDtEjbPersistent:forAllPersistentFields superclasses="false">
> >     java.lang.String <XDtMethod:propertyName/>
> >
> >
> <**ifNotLastPeristentFieldThenPrintThis**>,</**ifNotLastPeristentFieldThenPr
> > intThis**>
> > </XDtEjbPersistent:forAllPersistentFields>)
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Chris
> > -=-=-=
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Ara Abrahamian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: 19 February 2002 18:49
> > To: Shaw, Chris; 'xdoclet-user'
> > Subject: RE: [Xdoclet-user] Data Object and Strings
> >
> >
> > Write a template and decide on the type what to do. You have to do a
> lot
> > of if/elses and handle each type differently. You can also write
> > decoders (like the way Soap converts types from string to java, using a
> > set of demarshallers).
> >
> > In my application I'm doing the reverse: I construct an
> > XmlConfiguration, passing in a Class, load an xml file, look at the
> > Class and for each attribute I try to do a getMethod("get"+attrname),
> > then I check the type of the return type and in a big if/else convert
> > the string to the return type of the method and do a "set"+attrname()
> > passing in the converted value. I handle it in runtime, and based on
> the
> > assumption that there's get/set for attributes of the xml file in the
> > bean. It's pricier in runtime obviously. You may be interested to
> handle
> > it using Castor XML for example. It's also absolutely possible to
> > implement using a specialized xdoclet template files. Depends on your
> > taste :o) If I were to implement it now I would write a template (I'm
> > writing templates each day for various automation cases I face in our
> > app!!), using the strategy dataobject generation uses. Actually the
> > tricky part is the type conversion part because there's no generic way
> > to handle it and you should tackle it case by case for each type.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Ara.
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:xdoclet-user-
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Shaw, Chris
> > > Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 5:49 PM
> > > To: xdoclet-user
> > > Subject: [Xdoclet-user] Data Object and Strings
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > The project I am working on receives input (in a variety of ways) as
> > XML.
> > > Naturally, data will be in string format.....
> > >
> > > Does anyone have any ideas on how best to get String parameters as
> > Java
> > > Objects (String, Integer, Date etc) into the XDoclet-generated Data
> > > Object....?
> > >
> > > Simple field validation (type/constraints) is automatically
> > handled....so
> > > the only thing left (apart from complex validation) is to create the
> > > correct
> > > types.
> > >
> > > By default the XDoclet generated Data Object already knows the
> correct
> > > type
> > > for an Object...
> > > For example I could have:
> > >
> > >     setRefNumber(java.lang.Integer refNumber) {
> > >         this.refNumber = refNumber;
> > >     }
> > >
> > > What I really want, for *all* my object attributes, is something
> > like...
> > >     setRefNumberFromString(java.lang.String refNumber) {
> > >         this.refNumber = new Integer(refNumber);
> > >     )
> > >
> > > How can this best be achieved in the current framework? (or are there
> > > better
> > > ways of doing this?)
> > > I want to try and generate as much as possible and avoid having to
> > > hand-write such trivial things.....something the XDoclet concept
> > alreadt
> > > plays a *big* part in.
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > >
> > > Chris
> > > -=-=-=
> > >
> > > Any e-mail message from the European Central Bank (ECB) is sent in
> > good
> > > faith but shall neither be binding nor construed as constituting a
> > > commitment by the ECB except where provided for in a written
> > agreement.
> > > This e-mail is intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named
> > above.
> > > Any unauthorised disclosure, use or dissemination, either in whole or
> > in
> > > part, is prohibited.
> > > If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender
> > > immediately via e-mail and delete this e-mail from your system.
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Xdoclet-user mailing list
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-user
> >
> >
> > _________________________________________________________
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
> >
> > Any e-mail message from the European Central Bank (ECB) is sent in good
> faith but shall neither be binding nor construed as constituting a
> commitment by the ECB except where provided for in a written agreement.
> > This e-mail is intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named
> above.
> Any unauthorised disclosure, use or dissemination, either in whole or in
> part, is prohibited.
> > If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender
> immediately via e-mail and delete this e-mail from your system.
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Xdoclet-user mailing list
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-user
> >
> 
> Any e-mail message from the European Central Bank (ECB) is sent in good
> faith but shall neither be binding nor construed as constituting a
> commitment by the ECB except where provided for in a written agreement.
> This e-mail is intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above.
> Any unauthorised disclosure, use or dissemination, either in whole or in
> part, is prohibited.
> If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender
> immediately via e-mail and delete this e-mail from your system.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xdoclet-user mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-user
> 
> 

_______________________________________________
Xdoclet-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-user

Reply via email to