> The entitypk.j template in CVS generates public fields (plus one > serialVersionUID with package visibility). I don't remember how it is in > XDoclet 1.1.2. > Does WS complain about the serialVersionUID field or the member fields' > visibility?
It's a bug of WAS, doesn't check for fields to be public or non transient. > And here is to the developers: > This raises two questions: > -Why are members public? Is there anywhere in the EJB 1.1 or EJB 2.0 spec > that says pk fields must be public? I consider public fields the evil of > all Yes, in spec, like old cmp field stuff. > evils, so I think we sould at least provide an option to make the fields > private. > -Why does the serialVersionUID field have package visibility? Isn't it > supposed to be private? Yeah, but I'll be remove this seruid stuff right away as you know. Ara. _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ Xdoclet-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-user
