Hello Ara,
Friday, June 14, 2002, 2:06:57 PM, you wrote:
>> I disagree with you (and with my own previous statements!)
>>
>> After thinking about it I prefer
>>
>> * @ejb:finder
>> * signature="ABABABABA"
>> * @weblogic:finder
>> * signature="KUKUKUKUUK"
>> * @jboss:finder
>> * signature="TOTOTOTOTO"
>>
>> rather than
>>
>> * @ejb:finder
>> * signature="ABABABABA"
>> * weblogic-signature="KUKUKUKUUK"
>> * jboss-signature="TOTOTOTOTO"
AA> It gets tricky when you can have multiple ejb:finders.
Well, I'm lost! :-)
Seriously, I've now got a patched weblogic-cmp-rdbms-jar-xml.xdt
which gets me moving again.
Changes are
(1) Only generating the <weblogic-query></weblogic-query> if
weblogic:finder used, NOT if ejb:finder user.
[This is quite valid, but could break existing ejb:finder tag
iff using WL-specific code there]
(2) If weblogic:finder used, weblogic-ql now wrapped in CDATA.
But apart from (1), it currently uses the weblogic:finder tag with
both signature & query attributes, (plus the original ejb:finder
will still be needed...
To do the other way, the test would need to be something like "for
all ejb:finder tags that have a weblogic-signature attribute", but
that's beyond me at the moment...
So, should I submit what I've curently got, or should I just submit
the change that would add the CDATA?
--
Best regards,
Gwyn mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________________________
Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference
August 25-28 in Las Vegas -
http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm?source=osdntextlink
_______________________________________________
Xdoclet-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-user
