Ok, what i really wanted to ask was if it wasn't documented because the functionality was untested/unstable or if it was due to limited time and resources. I'm sorry if it sounded demanding in any way, that was not my intent. XDoclet is a brilliant piece of software and i'm very grateful for all your efforts in making it.
Regards, Johan Isacsson MGON Marcus Brito wrote: >Em Ter, 2002-06-25 �s 07:31, Johan Isacsson escreveu: > > > >>Are there any reasons for this not being oficially documented for >>XDoclet 1.1.2? >>I tried it and it seems to work well... >> >> > >Yes, there is a reason: we're busy. We still have lots of open bugs, >todo itens, feature requests... our documentation is lagging behind. >Sorry for the incovenience, we're trying to address this issue. > >(wow, this almost sounds like microsoft!) > > > ------------------------------------------------------- Sponsored by: ThinkGeek at http://www.ThinkGeek.com/ _______________________________________________ Xdoclet-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-user
