> -related to the above suggestion/question of associating @castor:field > tags > with the java class' fields, is anyone working on a template/mechanism > whereby another key=value could be added to the @castor:field tag like > "createGetter=no" (default would be "yes") and "createSetter=no" (again, > default would be "yes"), so that in one's original .java file, one would > really only have to specify the class name, the fields (and its associated > @castor:field tags), and any necessary *business* methods? in other > words, > eliminate the need for writing the setters and getters altogether, and > then > have the subtask automatically generate new .java files with the > automatically-generated (default) setters and getters...
Hey! You're becoming too lazy :-) It's something an IDE should do. I just alt+insert in IDEA and the getter/setter is generated. Ara. ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by: Jabber Inc. Don't miss the IM event of the season | Special offer for OSDN members! JabConf 2002, Aug. 20-22, Keystone, CO http://www.jabberconf.com/osdn _______________________________________________ Xdoclet-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-user
