A wise old hermit known only as Paul Cantrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> once said:
> Ejbdoclet generates subclasses of my session beans, and uses > them as the actual EJB object instead of my class. > > Why? Because it's good practise. It separates the business contract from the technical contract, so you don't have ejbActivate, ejbPassivate etc. cluttering up your code and distracting you from the methods implementing your business logic. Less code = easier to maintain, plus separation of concerns is generally a good idea anyway. > Can I turn this off? Possibly. What version are you using? With the current CVS, just leaving out the <session> subtask should be enough. With some of the earlier versions (I forget which) it was a mandatory subtask and couldn't be disabled. Andrew. ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Bringing you mounds of caffeinated joy. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Xdoclet-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-user
