-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi,
i think that the behavior of valueobjects of type composite is not right. Per definition in UML a relation of type composition only says that the related object could not exists without the object that holds the reference to it. But nothing is said about the accessors. I want to explain it on an example: ------------ ----------- | Employee | | Address | ------------ |---------| | |1 1| | | [...] |<>---------->| [...] | | | | | |----------| |---------| So an employee has an address and the Address object can only exists with the Employee object. The address is only accessible from the employee object. So i have tested to use the compose keywords to reflect this situation, but the generated CMP class tries to set the employee in the address class but there is no corresponding method (unidirectional). If i use aggregate it works correctly. So my questions: have i misunderstand the definition od composition and aggregation or are this terms missused ? best regards Ingo Bruell - --- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <ICQ# 40377720> Oldenburg PGP-Fingerprint: CB01 AE12 B359 87C4 BF1C 953C 8FE7 C648 169E E5FC Germany PGP-Public-Key available at pgpkeys.mit.edu -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP 6.5i iQA/AwUBPeSn1o/nxkgWnuX8EQJ8AACguJrBM1UAvdPBZZA72pGJvlZDvOoAn3hm nVah3GvZq6IUmoYkY5Mfhxx6 =zgEr -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Get the new Palm Tungsten T handheld. Power & Color in a compact size! http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?palm0002en _______________________________________________ Xdoclet-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-user
