> Relations are damn complex. Sometimes, it's hard to guess how hard some thing is. I really don't know but believe you.
> Even with XDoclet. Have you tried > http://boss.bekk.no/boss/middlegen/? You'll even find links > to source that > might answer your question. This looks cool. Thanks. As to my case, I have unidirection so I just made it many-to-many. Thanks, alex > > Aslak > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > > Alex Loubyansky > > Sent: 13. desember 2002 12:48 > > To: Xdoclet-User (E-mail) > > Cc: 'Michael Newcomb' > > Subject: [Xdoclet-user] RE: one-to-many relation-table-mapping > > > > > > Sorry, it's not important for unidirectional as I can safely make it > > many-to-many but for bidirectional one-to-many it's a problem. > > > > Thanks, > > alex > > > > > > > > Hello guys, > > > > > > I need to use relation-table-mapping in one-to-many > > > unidirectional relationship in JBoss. > > > But it seems like it's not possible to generate with XDoclet1.2. > > > > > > /** > > > * Account - Attachments one-to-many bidirectional > > > * > > > * @ejb.interface-method > > > * @ejb.relation > > > * name="Account-Attachment" > > > * role-name="Account-has-Attachments" > > > * target-ejb="Attachment" > > > * target-role-name="Attachment-belongsto-Account" > > > * target-multiple="false" > > > * @jboss.relation-table > > > * table-name="account_attachment" > > > * create-table=${jboss.create.table} > > > * remove-table=${jboss.remove.table} > > > * > > > * @jboss.relation > > > * fk-constraint="false" > > > * related-pk-field="attachmentId" > > > * fk-column="attachmentId" > > > * @jboss.target-relation > > > * fk-constraint="false" > > > * related-pk-field="accountId" > > > * fk-column="accountId" > > > */ > > > public abstract Collection getAttachments(); > > > public abstract void setAttachments(); > > > > > > This will produce <foreign-key-mapping/> in jbosscmp-jdbc.xml. > > > If I set target-multiple to true, then jbosscmp-jdbc.xml will > > > be correct but ejb-jar.xml of course won't be. > > > > > > Any comments? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > alex > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > This sf.net email is sponsored by: > > With Great Power, Comes Great Responsibility > > Learn to use your power at OSDN's High Performance Computing Channel > > http://hpc.devchannel.org/ > > _______________________________________________ > > Xdoclet-user mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-user > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by: > With Great Power, Comes Great Responsibility > Learn to use your power at OSDN's High Performance Computing Channel > http://hpc.devchannel.org/ > _______________________________________________ > Xdoclet-user mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-user ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by: With Great Power, Comes Great Responsibility Learn to use your power at OSDN's High Performance Computing Channel http://hpc.devchannel.org/ _______________________________________________ Xdoclet-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-user
