Hm, tough one! There should be a way to at least exercise some control over the generated name. I realise that it's a design flaw (the other side of the relation is what controls that name, not the ejb being referred to). I'd say the old behaviour should be restored, and maybe a new parameter added that allows a descriptor to specify different names there (to handle the fix for the other bug)? Whatever fix is decided on, it's important that backward compatibility is maintained.

Hani

On Thursday, December 19, 2002, at 09:10 PM, Aslak Hellesoy wrote:


-----Original Message-----
From: Konstantin Priblouda [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 19. desember 2002 18:12
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: xdoclet-user
Subject: Re: [Xdoclet-user] JNDI_NAME & COMP_NAME


Here is where it changed:

http://tinyurl.com/3old

Konstantin?
Well, there was an issue which I fixed...
And apparently you created a new bug.

I see you reopened it
Shall I tweak it back?

Could you try to keep the original bug fixed and also fix what Hani's
complaining about? Any suggestions Hani?

Cheers,
Aslak

regards,

=====
Konstantin Priblouda ( ko5tik )    Freelance Software developer
< http://www.pribluda.de > < play java games -> http://www.yook.de >
< render charts online -> http://www.pribluda.de/povray/ >

__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:  The Best Geek Holiday Gifts!
Time is running out!  Thinkgeek.com has the coolest gifts for
your favorite geek.   Let your fingers do the typing.   Visit Now.
T H I N K G E E K . C O M        http://www.thinkgeek.com/sf/
_______________________________________________
Xdoclet-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-user

Reply via email to