> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Hani > Suleiman > Sent: 28. januar 2003 12:43 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Xdoclet-user] DRY > > > I actually like the way it's done now. The reason is that I can > have my beans > contain all the tags that they could require, from that I can > further apply > project wide generation rules from the build.xml. For example, my > ejb might have > view-type="both", but for whatever reason, I want to turn off > remote views to > check something. Right now it's a matter of removing one line in > build.xml, > rather than going through every bean (hundreds, in my case!) and > changing what > is generated. >
Thinking about it, I think we could achieve both. If you don't have a subtask in your build.xml, stuff will be generated if the @tag is there. -BUT: You could turn it off if you want like this: <ejbdoclet...> <localinterface generate="false"/> </ejbdoclet> So instead of actually removing <localinterface/>, you add it and specify generate="false" This way we'd satisy DRY and you. -And we could also still support the current style to be more bwc. Thoughts? ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com _______________________________________________ Xdoclet-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-user
