hello, I am encountering a funny situation, I dont know if I am doing something wrong or if this is how the value object pattern works:
When I call MyBeanLocal.getValueObject() I get a value object with all the CMP fields populated except my UID field! Therefore I cannot do any further lookups with this object because I have no UID! I noticed that in the generated code for MyBeanCMP, the method getValueObject creates a new value object and does not set that field. I understand that the UID is not something that we would want to be modified in the ValueObject, but, supposing we were to pass a graph of CMR value objects back to the client, of what use are these objects if we dont know their UID ? Surely I'm missing something ? I apologize if this question is utterly ignorant, can someone please shed some light ? if the Value object does not contain the UID (though the code does have accessors for this field) then how does the interaction take place between the client and server to acquire the UID in an alternate way, and what happens if you're dealing with a collection of VO's ? Thanks Nat ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The debugger for complex code. Debugging C/C++ programs can leave you feeling lost and disoriented. TotalView can help you find your way. Available on major UNIX and Linux platforms. Try it free. www.etnus.com _______________________________________________ xdoclet-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-user
