Hi Erik, Probably a good idea to read people's postings before replying then. Nowhere in my posting did I "blame" xdoclet. I had a problem, asked for help and got a smart-arsed worthless response from you.
Edward On 6/10/03 11:54 pm, "Erik Hatcher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well technically speaking it wasn't an XDoclet "problem" though. Don't > blame XDoclet for a mistake in your generated configuration file :) > One of the first rules when doing code generation is to fully > understand the underlying technology/configuration before adding > generation to the mix. Had you had a working Struts site going before > adding XDoclet, you would have had a valid configuration file to > compare against and seen the issue right away. > > Erik > > On Monday, October 6, 2003, at 02:16 PM, Edward Kenworthy wrote: > >> Got the answer from javaranch, and despite Erik's assertion it was >> something >> to do with xdoclet I had to change, I had to add another merge file, >> struts-plugins.xml (which is of course xdoclet specific) with the >> following >> in it (which is struts specific): >> >> <plug-in className="org.apache.struts.validator.ValidatorPlugIn"> >> <set-property property="pathnames" >> value="/WEB-INF/validator-rules.xml,/WEB-INF/validation.xml"/> >> </plug-in> >> >> Edward >> >> On 5/10/03 8:53 am, "Edward Kenworthy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> I'm using xdoclet to generate my struts config etc files and I'm >>> having a >>> problem. >>> >>> The symptom of the first one is when I click on the action (foo.do) >>> link on >>> my page it goes straight to the success page - no sign of the input >>> page. >>> >>> Loking at the server logs I note these three things happen, in this >>> order: >>> >>> 1. The action form's constructor is called. >>> 2. "org.apache.commons.validator.ValidatorException: Resources not >>> defined >>> for Validator" is thrown. >>> 3. The action's execute method is called. >>> >>> Validator.xml is in the web-inf directory of my war. >>> >>> Can anyone give me a pointer to what I should check here ? Is this one >>> error, or two unrelated ones do you think ? >>> >>> Thanks in advance >>> >>> Edward >>> >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------- >>> This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek >>> Welcome to geek heaven. >>> http://thinkgeek.com/sf >>> _______________________________________________ >>> xdoclet-user mailing list >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-user >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------- >> This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek >> Welcome to geek heaven. >> http://thinkgeek.com/sf >> _______________________________________________ >> xdoclet-user mailing list >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-user > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Welcome to geek heaven. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > _______________________________________________ > xdoclet-user mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-user ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ xdoclet-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-user
