This is a classic dilemma that Ant and XDoclet have shared for a while. Are there any XDoclet committers that use OJB? If not, then it doesn't really make sense for us to put it under our control and maintain.
I think it really makes more sense housed under OJB personally. It's tough to be consistent though, as XDoclet houses several modules that also really belong to vendors and other projects as well.
Erik
On Monday, November 10, 2003, at 11:36 AM, Brian McCallister wrote:
I am not sure if there is a history of this on the list, but is there any reason *not* to check in Thomas Dudziak's OJB module to the xdoclet repository? It works great, is easy to use, and is definitely a thumbs-up tool from the OJB committers. I would very much like to see it here as it is much more of an xdoclet tool than OJB tool. Thomas has supported it for a while on ojb-user and it is actively maintained by him.
-Brian
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: ApacheCon 2003, 16-19 November in Las Vegas. Learn firsthand the latest developments in Apache, PHP, Perl, XML, Java, MySQL, WebDAV, and more! http://www.apachecon.com/ _______________________________________________ xdoclet-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-user
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: ApacheCon 2003, 16-19 November in Las Vegas. Learn firsthand the latest developments in Apache, PHP, Perl, XML, Java, MySQL, WebDAV, and more! http://www.apachecon.com/ _______________________________________________ xdoclet-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-user
