Peter Bright wrote:
I've been using the updated files at http://www.lunatech.com/archives/2005/12/05/support-for-generics-in-xdoc let-12-anyone with great success.
Good tip, thanks.
I don't know or much care about xdoclet 2. The developers seem to have made all sorts of changes for no particularly good reason, whilst all the while failing to realize that people don't use xdoclet because of its underlying architecture. They use it because of its plugins. Xdoclet 1 has plugins I want. Xdoclet 2 does not. I don't care how much more wonderful writing plugins is thanks to Generama (whatever the hell that is). The plugins people want already exist for xdoclet 1, so why would anyone migrate?
My understanding of the situation is that users can use both, depending on what plugin (and plugin quality) they are after. Developers on the other hand, have made it easier to add plugins (and plugin developers) in the future with X2.
Manos ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click _______________________________________________ xdoclet-user mailing list xdoclet-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-user
