--- Chema <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > And why don't you use two different "ejbdoclet" > entries?
ejbdoclet in current would surely barf if it finds several bean declarations - AFAIR, last one would win but I'm not sure. In any case you will need some patching. and XD2 is easier to patch. > Each one would have a "deploymentdescriptor" entry > and a "fileset" entry. > The "deploymentdescriptor" entry would define its > own XML descriptor. > And "fileset" entry would define the right file > patterns ( **/*.java or **/* > RO.java ) Fileset would not help, because it is the same source ----[ Konstantin Pribluda http://www.pribluda.de ]---------------- Still using XDoclet 1.x? XDoclet 2 is released and of production quality. check it out: http://xdoclet.codehaus.org ____________________________________________________________________________________ We won't tell. Get more on shows you hate to love (and love to hate): Yahoo! TV's Guilty Pleasures list. http://tv.yahoo.com/collections/265 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ xdoclet-user mailing list xdoclet-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-user
