> What about feat. matrix?
http://wiki.xen.org/wiki/XCP/XenServer_Feature_Matrix
That matrix is out-of-date now. There is quite a bit of work that needs to
happen on the wiki to reflect the change. You may want read
http://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-api/2013-06/msg00143.html
(including
answers). This thread should answer most questions that were raised in this
thread.
Lars


On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 7:26 PM, srinivas jonn <jmsrini...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> also the WSS - web-self-service appliance works only with XCP -
>
> what about xenserver 6.2 + WSS - free ?
>
>   ------------------------------
>  *From:* Britt Dodd <brittman...@gmail.com>
> *To:* Claudio Mastrapasqua <kla...@hotmail.com>
> *Cc:* "xen-api@lists.xen.org" <xen-api@lists.xen.org>
> *Sent:* Tuesday, 25 June 2013 9:21 PM
>
> *Subject:* Re: [Xen-API] www.xenserver.org vs XCP
>
> Or in the feature matrix, I hope the free tier didn't just get dynamic
> memory control cut out.
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 11:46 AM, Claudio Mastrapasqua <kla...@hotmail.com
> > wrote:
>
> Great!
> I hope HA and DWB features will be available soon.
> What about feat. matrix?
> http://wiki.xen.org/wiki/XCP/XenServer_Feature_Matrix
>
> Thank you
>
> Best,
> Claudio
>
> > Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2013 16:36:34 +0100
> > From: mike.mccl...@citrix.com
> > To: g...@kzsdabas.hu
> > CC: xen-api@lists.xen.org
> > Subject: Re: [Xen-API] www.xenserver.org vs XCP
>
> >
> > On 25/06/13 15:36, Gémes Géza wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I saw at
> > >
> http://www.xenserver.org/overview-xenserver-open-source-virtualization/source-code.html
> > > that xenserver source code is/going to be open sourced, does that mean,
> > > that xcp will be merged?
> >
> > Yes, you could think of it that way. XCP and XenServer have always been
> > built from the same codebase, but XCP was essentially a (slightly)
> > stripped down, de-branded version of XenServer. Now that everything in
> > XenServer is open source, and all features are available for free, we
> > don't need to have a separate XCP anymore. You can see the email I sent
> > out just after this one for more details.
> >
> > Mike
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Xen-api mailing list
> > Xen-api@lists.xen.org
> > http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-api
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-api mailing list
> Xen-api@lists.xen.org
> http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-api
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-api mailing list
> Xen-api@lists.xen.org
> http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-api
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-api mailing list
> Xen-api@lists.xen.org
> http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-api
>
>
_______________________________________________
Xen-api mailing list
Xen-api@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-api

Reply via email to