>>> On 08.08.13 at 13:39, Lars Kurth <lars.ku...@xen.org> wrote: > Option 1) We could run two parallel content tracks for most of the event > (assuming we have enough content)
-1 > Option 2) We could use the second room for in-depth discussions (using > an unconference scheduling mechanism as we have done at the Hackathon: > if you want to know how this works do read > http://blog.xen.org/index.php/2013/05/28/event-report-xen-hackathon-2013/ - > we would use a simplified version of the mechanism described). These > would run in parallel to the main program, for example in the afternoon. > In other words, we would have "BoF type meetings decided on the day" or > "hacking sessions" or "get started with X" or "how do we solve problem > Z" etc. that would happen in the second room in parallel to talks. +1 > Option 3) A mixture of both 0 Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-api mailing list Xen-api@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-api
