I am curious for a little information and am wondering if anyone can
provide it.
I originally used the XCP ISO but had to ditch it because XCP wasn't
easily compatible with the software raid scenario that we used and since
have jumped over to KVM.
Personally I have never seen any hypervisor even come close to the
performance I have gotten from the Paravirtualization KVM solution on
Debian. It blows everything else I have used to date (all freeware,
ESXi and XCP 1.1) for small business. But I would like to know what am
I missing by going with para virtualizatoin like KVM over a hardware
thingy mbob (cant remember the actually name sorry, its the one where
the VM gets direct access to the hardware). I have windows server 2008
w/ 2 VCPU's and 1024mb of VRAM booting up in 10 seconds and shutting
completely down in 10 seconds. This is light years better than even
with dedicated software. The hyperthreading seems to be exactly as it
should, so for a small business (or even a larger business such as
UBISOFT) what benefits does one have using XCP over something like KVM.
I am simply asking because I don't understand why everyone on the planet
hasn't jumped onto KVM's.
Thank you and no fanboyism junk here, simply want to know for the sake
of having knowledge.
Scott
On 1/5/12 7:58 PM, George Shuklin wrote:
I have no idea about Citrix planes, but it looks like kronos is moving
forward.
On 14.12.2011 02:26, Christian Lachance wrote:
Hi,
I am working in the Ubisoft Cloud team and we are waiting for XCP 1.5
to be released. Looking at the roadmap, RC1 should have been
released in November and Final release in December. Is there any
news on XCP 1.5 release date or RC1 download? If found the dates
here: http://wiki.xen.org/xenwiki/XCP_Roadmap
_______________________________________________
xen-api mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-api
_______________________________________________
xen-api mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-api
