On 01/15/2012 03:30 AM, George Shuklin wrote: > OK, sorry, miss that. > > But idea to split packages to separate SM's is still actual. If you > install storage-manager, you expect it will provide same as normal XCP > (xe sr-create and it works), but this is not completely true: You will > need to set up some other packages, so using hard dependence for > something like xcp-storage-manager-nfs and suggest for > xcp-strorage-manager-nfs in dependence of xcp-storage-manager will be > better, IMHO.
IMO (and that's the one of many Debian contributors and developers), you expect users to read the README.Debian which documents all this. I just added few lines about it in it. Now, if we have a separate xcp-storage-manager-nfs and xcp-storage-manager-samba, then these wouldn't be mandatory (eg: not hard dependencies), so it wouldn't change anything. Best would be if xe-mount-iso-sr was checking if there is the needed software installed by default, and was throwing a nice error message telling what to do (eg: apt-get install) if the relevant packages are missing. Thomas P.S: No need to Cc: me, I'm registered to the list. _______________________________________________ xen-api mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-api
