On Tue, Nov 07, 2017 at 09:41:58AM +0000, Roger Pau Monné wrote: > > Okay, so EOPNOTSUPP is it then, which is also my preference > > (due to there being so many uses of EINVAL elsewhere). I've > > merely mentioned that EINVAL would be suitable since, > > technically speaking, the value in a "sub-operation" field being > > invalid is no different from this being the case for the value in > > any other field. > > If I don't get any more comments I will re-send this patch separately > using EOPNOTSUPP instead of ENOSYS. I will also keep the Acks gathered > so far unless anyone objects. >
Please send a new patch. I believe this one is already applied. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
