On 24/03/2025 16:22, Alejandro Vallejo wrote: > > > On Mon Mar 24, 2025 at 1:08 PM GMT, Michal Orzel wrote: >> >> >> On 19/03/2025 15:01, Alejandro Vallejo wrote: >>> >>> Doesn't this regenerate the golang bindings? >> FYI, it does not. The bindings are already there for NrSpis and default >> value is >> does not result in a change (for verification I checked max_grant_frames that >> uses LIBXL_MAX_GRANT_DEFAULT). >> >> ~Michal > > Oh, good then. Though it does raise the (completely separate) question of how > correct those bindings might be if they ignore the IDL's default values... :/ Why ignore. AFAICS libxl_domain_build_info_init is called there to grab default values. ~Michal
- [PATCH] tools/arm: Fix nr_spis handling v2 Michal Orzel
- Re: [PATCH] tools/arm: Fix nr_spis handling v2 Luca Fancellu
- Re: [PATCH] tools/arm: Fix nr_spis handling v2 Anthony PERARD
- Re: [PATCH] tools/arm: Fix nr_spis handling v2 Orzel, Michal
- Re: [PATCH] tools/arm: Fix nr_spis handling v2 Alejandro Vallejo
- Re: [PATCH] tools/arm: Fix nr_spis handling v2 Andrew Cooper
- Re: [PATCH] tools/arm: Fix nr_spis handling... Orzel, Michal
- Re: [PATCH] tools/arm: Fix nr_spis handling... Alejandro Vallejo
- Re: [PATCH] tools/arm: Fix nr_spis handling v2 Orzel, Michal
- Re: [PATCH] tools/arm: Fix nr_spis handling... Alejandro Vallejo
- Re: [PATCH] tools/arm: Fix nr_spis hand... Orzel, Michal
- Re: [PATCH] tools/arm: Fix nr_spis... Alejandro Vallejo