On 14.04.2025 20:07, Alejandro Vallejo wrote:
> On Wed Apr 9, 2025 at 11:15 PM BST, Denis Mukhin wrote:
>> On Tuesday, April 8th, 2025 at 9:07 AM, Alejandro Vallejo <agarc...@amd.com> 
>> wrote:
>>> @@ -233,6 +264,12 @@ static int __init process_domain_node(
>>> return -ENODATA;
>>> }
>>>
>>> + if ( bd->domid == DOMID_INVALID )
>>>
>>> + bd->domid = get_initial_domain_id();
>>>
>>> + else if ( bd->domid != get_initial_domain_id() )
>>>
>>> + printk(XENLOG_WARNING
>>> + "WARN: Booting without initial domid not supported.\n");
>>
>> Drop WARN since the log message is XENLOG_WARNING level already?
> 
> As mentioned elsewhere, the point of those prefixes are to be readable.

This, however, imo is a matter of consistency across the codebase, not just
within hyperlaunch. Plus (again imo) if anything, prefixes that are part of
the log output should contain proper words ("Warning:" or "Error:"), and
they shouldn't needlessly "shout" (i.e. "FATAL:" is okay-ish to be all caps,
but the others aren't).

Jan

Reply via email to