On 15.04.2025 13:59, Alejandro Vallejo wrote:
> On Tue Apr 15, 2025 at 7:17 AM BST, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 14.04.2025 19:27, Alejandro Vallejo wrote:
>>> So... how frontally opposed would you be to restoring the ramdisk
>>> nomenclature? Also, for ease of rebasing future patches it'd be far
>>> nicer to go back to ramdisk rather than reinventing some new name.
>>
>> Well, I fear I wouldn't ack such a patch. If everyone else agrees
>> that "ramdisk" is the best of all names (or at least getting close),
>> I'd perhaps mumble over, but let it go in.
> 
> Ok... When I send v4 I'll do so keeping the "module" rename. Meanwhile,
> I'll try to think of some options. Calling Xen's modules and the booted
> kernel modules the same way is just way too confusing.
> 
> I take it you have the same dislike for initrd as you do for ramdisk?

Indeed.

Jan

Reply via email to