On 4/16/25 09:54, Alejandro Vallejo wrote:
On Wed Apr 16, 2025 at 2:42 PM BST, Daniel P. Smith wrote:
On 4/10/25 08:08, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 08.04.2025 18:07, Alejandro Vallejo wrote:
From: "Daniel P. Smith" <dpsm...@apertussolutions.com>
Introduce the `cpus` property, named as such for dom0less compatibility, that
represents the maximum number of vpcus to allocate for a domain. In the device
^
|
"vcpus"
Nit: vcpus
I agree with you here, the issue is that it was requested that we keep
this field in line with Arm's DT, and they unfortunately used `cpus` to
specify the vcpu allocation.
He meant in the commit message. There's a typo.
Right, so I guess my response should have been further down. He points
it out as a nit the second time, and then his final comment led me to
believe he was raising an issue with vcpu vs cpu and not just the typo.
v/r,
dps
